Sodalite
Thriving Thriving Swift SW
40
Sodalite superuser404notfound/Sodalite

Native Jellyfin client for Apple TV, iPhone and iPad with built-in Seerr requests. Direct Play for movies, shows, music and live TV with DVR, real HDR10 / HDR10+ / Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos. AirPlay and Picture in Picture on iOS. Powered by AetherEngine.

https://sodalite.superuser404.de ↗
HEALTH 97 / Healthy
// solo builder// hidden gem apple-tvdolby-visionhdrjellyfinmedia-playerswiftuitvosdirect-playdolby-atmoshdr10

// readme

Sodalite

Your Jellyfin library and Seerr, together on every Apple screen.
Native for Apple TV, iPhone and iPad. Instant playback, real HDR, real Dolby Atmos.
Browse what you own. Request what’s missing. Tune into live TV.
On the couch, in your hand, wherever you are.

🧪 Public Beta is open. One TestFlight link installs on Apple TV, iPhone and iPad: https://testflight.apple.com/join/nWeQzmBX See BETA.md for what to focus on and how to report bugs.


One app, every Apple screen

Sodalite is a single universal app. The same library, the same Seerr request loop, the same custom video stack, whether you’re on the Apple TV in the living room, an iPhone on the train, or an iPad in bed. Sign in once per server; the whole experience follows the device you pick up.

It brings Jellyfin and Seerr together in the same UI. Watch what’s already on your server. Spot something on a trending row that isn’t there yet? Request it from inside the app, and Seerr handles the rest. No switching to a phone browser, no pinging your…

The Undervalued Score +

How much a project earns versus how much attention it actually gets. Above 50 means the work is outrunning its audience. Recomputed nightly from commit velocity, contributor effort, issue resolution, fork utility, release cadence, and project maturity — divided by a logarithmic reach factor.

score  = signal / reach

signal = 0.25·commit_velocity   // commits in last 90 days (cap 30)
       + 0.20·contributor_work  // unique authors × velocity (cap 100)
       + 0.20·issue_resolution  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·fork_ratio        // forks ÷ stars (proxy for real usage)
       + 0.10·release_cadence   // releases in 90 days (cap 3)
       + age_bonus              // +0 to +0.30 after 6 months
       + homepage_bonus         // +0.05 if homepage is set

reach  = log₁₀(stars + watchers + 10)
The Health Score +

Is the project alive and maintained right now? A 0–100 pulse recomputed nightly from commit recency, rhythm, how fast issues close, and how quickly PRs get merged.

health = 0.35·recency       // days since last commit (90d decay)
       + 0.25·cadence       // commit rhythm consistency
       + 0.20·issue_health  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·pr_health     // merged ÷ total PRs
Health bands +

The colour and label on every card come straight from the health score.

Healthy   80 – 100   active, responsive, regular releases
Stable    60 – 79    maintained, steady, no alarms
Quiet     40 – 59    slowing down — watch this one
At Risk    0 – 39    going dark · candidate for rescue
// Tags — what each label means +

Tags are independent behavioral signals computed nightly. A project can hold multiple at once. They drive the home page sections.

solo_builder      one person holds > 80% of commits (last 180d)
needs_contributors has open "help wanted" or "good first issue" labels
hidden_gem        < 100 stars · active in last 3 months · documented
legacy_hero       repo > 5 years old · committed this year
fork_magnet       forks/stars > 0.5 · used as template or dependency
release_machine   5+ releases in the last 90 days
under_pressure    > 10 open issues · ≤ 2 contributors · health ≥ 60
community_watch   watchers > stars · devs tracking before the public
community_hub     GitHub Discussions enabled · > 20 discussions
funded            maintainer has active funding channel
Why rank against stars at all? +

Stars are an outcome, not effort. A project with 8 stars and daily commits is doing more interesting work than one coasting on 8k. We measure the building, then divide by the attention already received — so the genuinely undervalued rise to the top.

// stars   = lagging indicator
// commits = leading indicator
// we rank by the leading one