Thriving Thriving Shell SH
43
filter-lists SamirPaulb/filter-lists

Ultimate ad-blocking filter list auto-updated every day from 70+ trusted sources. Blocks ads, trackers, malware, phishing, annoyances, crypto miners, and more. Single-URL subscription for uBlock Origin, Brave, and AdGuard.

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SamirPaulb/filter-lists/refs/heads/main/filters.txt ↗
HEALTH 70 / Stable
// solo builder// hidden gem ad-blockeradblockadblockerfilter-listsprivacytracker-blockerublock-originadblocker-listsadguardbrave-browser

// readme

Filter Lists

Comprehensive ad, tracker, malware, phishing & annoyance filter list — auto-compiled from 70+ trusted sources into a single file.

Subscribe

Add this one URL to your browser:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SamirPaulb/filter-lists/refs/heads/main/filters.txt

uBlock Origin (Desktop)

  1. Dashboard → Filter lists → Import → paste the URL above
  2. Click “Apply changes”

One-time fix to prevent YouTube anti-adblock detection:

uBlock Origin silently disables trusted-* scriptlets (the YouTube ad bypass mechanism) from external subscriptions by default. Fix it once:

  1. Dashboard → Settings → check “I am an advanced user” → click the ⚙ gear icon
  2. Find trustedListPrefixes (default value: ublock-)
  3. Change it to:
    ublock- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SamirPaulb/
    
  4. Save

This tells uBlock Origin to trust this list, enabling the trusted-replace-fetch-response, trusted-prevent-dom-bypass, and trusted-rpnt scriptlets that patch YouTube’s ad detection at the JavaScript level. Without this step, YouTube can detect the adblocker and show a popup.

Brave Shields (Desktop & Mobile)

  1. brave://adblock →…
The Undervalued Score +

How much a project earns versus how much attention it actually gets. Above 50 means the work is outrunning its audience. Recomputed nightly from commit velocity, contributor effort, issue resolution, fork utility, release cadence, and project maturity — divided by a logarithmic reach factor.

score  = signal / reach

signal = 0.25·commit_velocity   // commits in last 90 days (cap 30)
       + 0.20·contributor_work  // unique authors × velocity (cap 100)
       + 0.20·issue_resolution  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·fork_ratio        // forks ÷ stars (proxy for real usage)
       + 0.10·release_cadence   // releases in 90 days (cap 3)
       + age_bonus              // +0 to +0.30 after 6 months
       + homepage_bonus         // +0.05 if homepage is set

reach  = log₁₀(stars + watchers + 10)
The Health Score +

Is the project alive and maintained right now? A 0–100 pulse recomputed nightly from commit recency, rhythm, how fast issues close, and how quickly PRs get merged.

health = 0.35·recency       // days since last commit (90d decay)
       + 0.25·cadence       // commit rhythm consistency
       + 0.20·issue_health  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·pr_health     // merged ÷ total PRs
Health bands +

The colour and label on every card come straight from the health score.

Healthy   80 – 100   active, responsive, regular releases
Stable    60 – 79    maintained, steady, no alarms
Quiet     40 – 59    slowing down — watch this one
At Risk    0 – 39    going dark · candidate for rescue
// Tags — what each label means +

Tags are independent behavioral signals computed nightly. A project can hold multiple at once. They drive the home page sections.

solo_builder      one person holds > 80% of commits (last 180d)
needs_contributors has open "help wanted" or "good first issue" labels
hidden_gem        < 100 stars · active in last 3 months · documented
legacy_hero       repo > 5 years old · committed this year
fork_magnet       forks/stars > 0.5 · used as template or dependency
release_machine   5+ releases in the last 90 days
under_pressure    > 10 open issues · ≤ 2 contributors · health ≥ 60
community_watch   watchers > stars · devs tracking before the public
community_hub     GitHub Discussions enabled · > 20 discussions
funded            maintainer has active funding channel
Why rank against stars at all? +

Stars are an outcome, not effort. A project with 8 stars and daily commits is doing more interesting work than one coasting on 8k. We measure the building, then divide by the attention already received — so the genuinely undervalued rise to the top.

// stars   = lagging indicator
// commits = leading indicator
// we rank by the leading one