Newborn Newborn TypeScript TS
51
Aivatar-Demo ruiwuniu/Aivatar-Demo

Aivatar is a local-first desktop companion for AI coding agents. It turns Codex, Claude Code, opencode, or a custom local agent bridge into a lively pixel-room companion with selectable characters, upgraded room materials, live status, growth, bits, and room customization.

HEALTH 79 / Stable
// solo builder// hidden gem// release machine ai-avatarai-companionavatarclaude-codecli-toolscodexcoding-agentdesktop-appdesktop-petdeveloper-tools

// readme

Aivatar

EN | Aivatar is a local-first desktop companion for AI coding agents. It turns Codex, Claude Code, opencode, or a custom local agent bridge into a lively pixel-room companion with selectable characters, upgraded room materials, live status, growth, bits, and room customization.

中文 | Aivatar 是一个本地优先的 AI 编程智能体桌面伙伴。它把 Codex、Claude Code、opencode 或自定义本地 agent 桥接映射成像素房间里的小伙伴行为:思考、编码、等待、报错、完成任务,并通过多角色形象、升级后的房间材质、bits、成长、背包、商店和房间装修形成一个可互动的工作陪伴系统。

· · ·

0.2.1 Highlights / 0.2.1 更新亮点

EN

  • New companion appearances: Little Octopus, Rush Spark, Mood Slime, Red Crayfish, Cute Ghost, Cute Penguin, and Green Lizard.
  • Upgraded room visuals with richer floors, wall materials, windows, furniture skins, and animated room objects such as the record player, easel, phone, and tabletop items.
  • Broader AI agent support for Codex Desktop, Codex CLI, Claude Code, opencode, scheduled CLI tasks, and custom local status sources.

中文

  • 新增多个角色形象:小章鱼、急急 Spark、心情史莱姆、红色小龙虾、半透明小幽灵、可爱小企鹅、绿色小蜥蜴。
  • 升级房间视觉材质,包括更丰富的地板、墙面、窗景、家具皮肤,以及唱片机、画架、手机、桌面物件等动态房间物品。
  • 支持更多 AI agent 应用与工作流,包括 Codex Desktop、Codex CLI、Claude Code、opencode、定时 CLI 任务,以及可通过本地状态桥接接入的自定义 agent。…
The Undervalued Score +

How much a project earns versus how much attention it actually gets. Above 50 means the work is outrunning its audience. Recomputed nightly from commit velocity, contributor effort, issue resolution, fork utility, release cadence, and project maturity — divided by a logarithmic reach factor.

score  = signal / reach

signal = 0.25·commit_velocity   // commits in last 90 days (cap 30)
       + 0.20·contributor_work  // unique authors × velocity (cap 100)
       + 0.20·issue_resolution  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·fork_ratio        // forks ÷ stars (proxy for real usage)
       + 0.10·release_cadence   // releases in 90 days (cap 3)
       + age_bonus              // +0 to +0.30 after 6 months
       + homepage_bonus         // +0.05 if homepage is set

reach  = log₁₀(stars + watchers + 10)
The Health Score +

Is the project alive and maintained right now? A 0–100 pulse recomputed nightly from commit recency, rhythm, how fast issues close, and how quickly PRs get merged.

health = 0.35·recency       // days since last commit (90d decay)
       + 0.25·cadence       // commit rhythm consistency
       + 0.20·issue_health  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·pr_health     // merged ÷ total PRs
Health bands +

The colour and label on every card come straight from the health score.

Healthy   80 – 100   active, responsive, regular releases
Stable    60 – 79    maintained, steady, no alarms
Quiet     40 – 59    slowing down — watch this one
At Risk    0 – 39    going dark · candidate for rescue
// Tags — what each label means +

Tags are independent behavioral signals computed nightly. A project can hold multiple at once. They drive the home page sections.

solo_builder      one person holds > 80% of commits (last 180d)
needs_contributors has open "help wanted" or "good first issue" labels
hidden_gem        < 100 stars · active in last 3 months · documented
legacy_hero       repo > 5 years old · committed this year
fork_magnet       forks/stars > 0.5 · used as template or dependency
release_machine   5+ releases in the last 90 days
under_pressure    > 10 open issues · ≤ 2 contributors · health ≥ 60
community_watch   watchers > stars · devs tracking before the public
community_hub     GitHub Discussions enabled · > 20 discussions
funded            maintainer has active funding channel
Why rank against stars at all? +

Stars are an outcome, not effort. A project with 8 stars and daily commits is doing more interesting work than one coasting on 8k. We measure the building, then divide by the attention already received — so the genuinely undervalued rise to the top.

// stars   = lagging indicator
// commits = leading indicator
// we rank by the leading one