Thriving Thriving Java JV
↑ 85
percussioncms intersoftdatalabs-in/percussioncms

Percussion CMS — formerly CM1 / Rhythmyx / CM System by Percussion Software. Actively maintained by Intersoft Data Labs (Apache 2.0)

https://intsof.com/services/percussion-cms/ ↗
HEALTH 99 / Healthy
// solo builder cm1cmsystemcontent-creationcontent-generationcontent-managementcontent-management-systemcontent-marketingcontent-platformpercussionpercussioncms
09-2023 · today · natechadwick-intsof
★6 Post ↗ Share View on GitHub ↗

// readme

Percussion CMS

Actively maintained by Intersoft Data Labs · Apache 2.0 · Formerly Percussion CM1 / Rhythmyx / CM System

The refreshed login experience in the current development line (heading toward 8.2).

What is Percussion CMS?

Percussion CMS is a mature, enterprise-grade, decoupled / headless-capable content management system with roots going back to 1999. It unifies the content production strengths of the original CM1 with the deep development and integration capabilities of Rhythmyx.

It was designed from the beginning for multi-channel delivery — websites, static sites, XML/JSON feeds, databases, and custom channels — with strong workflow, permissions, and extensibility for both marketers and developers.

Smart architecture. Smart APIs. Smart UI.

Intersoft Data Labs assumed full responsibility for support, maintenance, and ongoing development of the Percussion CMS product line in July 2023 after Percussion Software ended commercial support. This repository is the official open-source home of the Java 21 / 8.2 product line under the Apache 2.0 license.

Current Status (August 2026)

| Version / line | Status…

↑ The Undervalued Score +

How much a project earns versus how much attention it actually gets. Above 50 means the work is outrunning its audience. Recomputed nightly from commit velocity, contributor effort, issue resolution, fork utility, release cadence, and project maturity — divided by a logarithmic reach factor.

score  = signal / reach

signal = 0.25·commit_velocity   // commits in last 90 days (cap 30)
       + 0.20·contributor_work  // unique authors × velocity (cap 100)
       + 0.20·issue_resolution  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·fork_ratio        // forks ÷ stars (proxy for real usage)
       + 0.10·release_cadence   // releases in 90 days (cap 3)
       + age_bonus              // +0 to +0.30 after 6 months
       + homepage_bonus         // +0.05 if homepage is set

reach  = log₁₀(stars + watchers + 10)█
♥ The Health Score +

Is the project alive and maintained right now? A 0–100 pulse recomputed nightly from commit recency, rhythm, how fast issues close, and how quickly PRs get merged.

health = 0.35·recency       // days since last commit (90d decay)
       + 0.25·cadence       // commit rhythm consistency
       + 0.20·issue_health  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·pr_health     // merged ÷ total PRs█
◷ Health bands +

The colour and label on every card come straight from the health score.

Healthy   80 – 100   active, responsive, regular releases
Stable    60 – 79    maintained, steady, no alarms
Quiet     40 – 59    slowing down — watch this one
At Risk    0 – 39    going dark · candidate for rescue█
// Tags — what each label means +

Tags are independent behavioral signals computed nightly. A project can hold multiple at once. They drive the home page sections.

solo_builder      one person holds > 80% of commits (last 180d)
needs_contributors has open "help wanted" or "good first issue" labels
hidden_gem        < 100 stars · active in last 3 months · documented
legacy_hero       repo > 5 years old · committed this year
fork_magnet       forks/stars > 0.5 · used as template or dependency
release_machine   5+ releases in the last 90 days
under_pressure    > 10 open issues · ≤ 2 contributors · health ≥ 60
community_watch   watchers > stars · devs tracking before the public
community_hub     GitHub Discussions enabled · > 20 discussions
funded            maintainer has active funding channel█
★ Why rank against stars at all? +

Stars are an outcome, not effort. A project with 8 stars and daily commits is doing more interesting work than one coasting on 8k. We measure the building, then divide by the attention already received — so the genuinely undervalued rise to the top.

// stars   = lagging indicator
// commits = leading indicator
// we rank by the leading one█