// readme

Robotics_Notebooks

机器人技术栈知识库 / Robotics research and engineering wiki.


在线演示

在线站点使用方式:首页按目标选入口(路线 / 搜索 / 图谱)——点「项目查询 / 知识图谱」会滚到对应模块并顺时针描边高亮;搜索框输入关键词即时命中知识页;知识图谱中每个点是一个知识页,颜色代表技术社区,连线是页面互链——悬停看简介,滚轮缩放、拖拽平移,点击节点打开详情侧栏并一键进知识页,支持 2D / 3D 视图切换。


适合谁

想系统学人形机器人运动控制 / 强化学习 / 模仿学习,有一定编程基础(Python / C++)与本科数学基础。

不知道从哪开始?直接看 运动控制成长路线


这个项目是什么

Robotics_Notebooks 是一个机器人工程知识库,不是资源收集箱。它把机器人技术栈拆成互联的知识页面——每个概念解释清楚是什么、为什么重要、和哪些概念相关。

不是:教科书(不系统讲理论)、笔记堆(有结构和依赖关系)、工具文档。


从哪里开始

你的目标入口
可视化探索知识图谱知识图谱
有一条路线照着走运动控制成长路线
用遥操作采集数据并实时操控人形(含全身 + 手指)遥操作纵深路线
设计力矩控制关节电机力矩电机设计纵深路线
The Undervalued Score +

How much a project earns versus how much attention it actually gets. Above 50 means the work is outrunning its audience. Recomputed nightly from commit velocity, contributor effort, issue resolution, fork utility, release cadence, and project maturity — divided by a logarithmic reach factor.

score  = signal / reach

signal = 0.25·commit_velocity   // commits in last 90 days (cap 30)
       + 0.20·contributor_work  // unique authors × velocity (cap 100)
       + 0.20·issue_resolution  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·fork_ratio        // forks ÷ stars (proxy for real usage)
       + 0.10·release_cadence   // releases in 90 days (cap 3)
       + age_bonus              // +0 to +0.30 after 6 months
       + homepage_bonus         // +0.05 if homepage is set

reach  = log₁₀(stars + watchers + 10)
The Health Score +

Is the project alive and maintained right now? A 0–100 pulse recomputed nightly from commit recency, rhythm, how fast issues close, and how quickly PRs get merged.

health = 0.35·recency       // days since last commit (90d decay)
       + 0.25·cadence       // commit rhythm consistency
       + 0.20·issue_health  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·pr_health     // merged ÷ total PRs
Health bands +

The colour and label on every card come straight from the health score.

Healthy   80 – 100   active, responsive, regular releases
Stable    60 – 79    maintained, steady, no alarms
Quiet     40 – 59    slowing down — watch this one
At Risk    0 – 39    going dark · candidate for rescue
// Tags — what each label means +

Tags are independent behavioral signals computed nightly. A project can hold multiple at once. They drive the home page sections.

solo_builder      one person holds > 80% of commits (last 180d)
needs_contributors has open "help wanted" or "good first issue" labels
hidden_gem        < 100 stars · active in last 3 months · documented
legacy_hero       repo > 5 years old · committed this year
fork_magnet       forks/stars > 0.5 · used as template or dependency
release_machine   5+ releases in the last 90 days
under_pressure    > 10 open issues · ≤ 2 contributors · health ≥ 60
community_watch   watchers > stars · devs tracking before the public
community_hub     GitHub Discussions enabled · > 20 discussions
funded            maintainer has active funding channel
Why rank against stars at all? +

Stars are an outcome, not effort. A project with 8 stars and daily commits is doing more interesting work than one coasting on 8k. We measure the building, then divide by the attention already received — so the genuinely undervalued rise to the top.

// stars   = lagging indicator
// commits = leading indicator
// we rank by the leading one