jennymod-installer
Thriving Thriving Java JV
32
jennymod-installer BeamChunin42/jennymod-installer

One-click Windows installer for JennyMod — the popular Minecraft mod. Automated setup, dependency detection, and seamless installation experience exclusively for Windows. No manual file moving, no Java path hunting.

HEALTH 60 / Stable
// solo builder// hidden gem javajenny-modjenny-mod-2026jenny-mod-all-versionsjenny-mod-minecraft-downloadminecraftminecraft-modmod-installermod-managermodding

// readme

jennyMod Installer

One-click Windows installer for JennyMod — the popular Minecraft mod!


What is jennyMod Installer?

jennyMod Installer is a zero-hassle, one-click setup tool built exclusively for Windows. No manual file moving, no hunting for your .minecraft folder, no Java path configuration — just run the installer and you’re done.

  • Automatically detects your Minecraft installation
  • Verifies Java version compatibility
  • Downloads and places the mod in the correct folder
  • Applies required configuration automatically

Features

FeatureDescription
Auto-detectionFinds .minecraft, MultiMC and Prism Launcher paths automatically
Java checkScans JAVA_HOME, standard install paths, and PATH
Progress UIReal-time download and installation progress bar
One-clickSingle .exe — no Python, no Java, no dependencies required
SafeOpen source — inspect every line before running
Auto-updateRepository updates automatically every 30 minutes via CI

Requirements

  • Windows 10 / 11 (64-bit)
  • Minecraft Java Edition already installed
  • Java 8 or higher (Java 17…
The Undervalued Score +

How much a project earns versus how much attention it actually gets. Above 50 means the work is outrunning its audience. Recomputed nightly from commit velocity, contributor effort, issue resolution, fork utility, release cadence, and project maturity — divided by a logarithmic reach factor.

score  = signal / reach

signal = 0.25·commit_velocity   // commits in last 90 days (cap 30)
       + 0.20·contributor_work  // unique authors × velocity (cap 100)
       + 0.20·issue_resolution  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·fork_ratio        // forks ÷ stars (proxy for real usage)
       + 0.10·release_cadence   // releases in 90 days (cap 3)
       + age_bonus              // +0 to +0.30 after 6 months
       + homepage_bonus         // +0.05 if homepage is set

reach  = log₁₀(stars + watchers + 10)
The Health Score +

Is the project alive and maintained right now? A 0–100 pulse recomputed nightly from commit recency, rhythm, how fast issues close, and how quickly PRs get merged.

health = 0.35·recency       // days since last commit (90d decay)
       + 0.25·cadence       // commit rhythm consistency
       + 0.20·issue_health  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·pr_health     // merged ÷ total PRs
Health bands +

The colour and label on every card come straight from the health score.

Healthy   80 – 100   active, responsive, regular releases
Stable    60 – 79    maintained, steady, no alarms
Quiet     40 – 59    slowing down — watch this one
At Risk    0 – 39    going dark · candidate for rescue
// Tags — what each label means +

Tags are independent behavioral signals computed nightly. A project can hold multiple at once. They drive the home page sections.

solo_builder      one person holds > 80% of commits (last 180d)
needs_contributors has open "help wanted" or "good first issue" labels
hidden_gem        < 100 stars · active in last 3 months · documented
legacy_hero       repo > 5 years old · committed this year
fork_magnet       forks/stars > 0.5 · used as template or dependency
release_machine   5+ releases in the last 90 days
under_pressure    > 10 open issues · ≤ 2 contributors · health ≥ 60
community_watch   watchers > stars · devs tracking before the public
community_hub     GitHub Discussions enabled · > 20 discussions
funded            maintainer has active funding channel
Why rank against stars at all? +

Stars are an outcome, not effort. A project with 8 stars and daily commits is doing more interesting work than one coasting on 8k. We measure the building, then divide by the attention already received — so the genuinely undervalued rise to the top.

// stars   = lagging indicator
// commits = leading indicator
// we rank by the leading one